The Adventures of Duncan Hunter

The Adventures of Duncan Hunter

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

It’s Time to Decertify DSM-5 and Reinstitute DSM-4

Rarely is there a discussion under what authority can a biological male compete with biological females.  World class tennis champion Martina Navratilova says “transgender women” are ‘cheating’ if they compete in women’s sports.  What is the authority whereby a biological male can legally use the shower or restroom facilities or dressing rooms set aside for biological females?  The problem is that there isn’t a law or an authority but rather the absence of terms used to describe mental disorders, specifically, sexual disorders.

For decades, Transgenderism and Gender Identity Disorder had been classified as mental disorders by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).  The DSM evolved from systems for collecting census and psychiatric hospital statistics, and from a United States Army manual on mental illnesses.  Revisions since its first publication in 1952 have incrementally added to the total number of mental disorders, and removed those no longer considered to be mental illnesses. 

In December 2012, the APA quietly announced changes to their DSM.  In version 5, Transvestitism, Transgenderism, and Gender Identity Disorders were eliminated and replaced with a new term, “gender dysphoria.”  Dysphoria is the distress a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at birth.  With a stroke of a pen, transvestitism, transgenderism, and gender identity disorder were no longer considered to be mental disorders. 

In essence, the APA announced the behaviors previously associated with transvestitism, transgenderism, and gender identity disorders were now considered “normal.”  Based on the DSM-5, if you are a male and identify as a female, this is now considered “normal.”  This new “normal” defies logic and common sense and one of the many unintended consequences of the APA’s cowardly actions is that the new DSM is used as the authority for sports competitions, something the APA never envisioned and the DSM was never designed for.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders was supposed to offer a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders.  It was not designed to be misused to give biological males athletic advantages over biological females.  The most important aspect of the DSM is that it “serves as a universal authority for psychiatric diagnoses.”  There are few parts of America or the United Nations the DSM doesn’t touch or influence.  “It is used, or relied upon, by clinicians, researchers, psychiatric drug regulation agencies, health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, the legal system, and policy makers.”  Athletic organizations are not listed. 

In previous versions of the DSM, where the behaviors associated with transvestitism, transgenderism, and gender identity disorders were considered a mental disorder, health insurance companies and hospitals would not authorize sexual reassignment surgery for a mental illness, that corrective surgery was not warranted.  Those seeking sexual reassignment had to pay for the surgery themselves either at a private clinic or overseas.  Prior to DSM-5, the appropriate treatment for gender identity disorders was therapy.  With the new DSM-5, no longer is gender identity disorder considered a mental disorder.  Those people with previous gender identity disorders argued that they no longer have a mental illness but they have a medically-correctable condition, just like surgery is needed to correct a physical birth defect such as cleft lip and palate.

There were many members of the APA who saw that the aggressive lobbying efforts of LGBTQ and other sexual activists would result in a substantial body of APA member psychiatrists kowtowing to the activists’ demands.  In one of the most artful displays of a mental illness, Dr. Dana Beyer wrote of their successful lobbying of the APA, in The End of Transgender as a Mental Illness: “Our greatest accomplishment on the Working Group was reconceptualizing the state of ‘being trans’ from a mental illness to a normal human variant.”  What the hell is a “normal human variant?”  This is chapter and verse from the movie Gaslight.  Normal human “variants” don’t pretend to be boys and race or wrestle girls.  Variants need therapy, not lessons on how to cheat in athletics.

There was more interest in changing the DSM to correct a perceived social injustice than understanding and treating a longstanding mental disorder.  One side caved to social injustice and agreed to eliminate sexual identity disorders from the DSM.  The other side didn’t have the votes to stop the madness. 

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital reiterated that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and “that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.”  Dr. McHugh was one of the losing 49% of the over 9,000-strong APA whose vote failed to retain the DSM-4 standard regarding sexual identity disorders. 

“‘Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said Dr. McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women.  Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”  Feminized men, whatever they have done to them surgically or medically, can dress up in sports bras and running shoes and play make believe female athletes but they are still males competing against females.  Martina said it: “They are cheating.”

The DSM as the U.S. universal authority for psychiatric diagnoses has been corrupted by external pressures.  “Various authorities criticized that many DSM-5 revisions or additions lack empirical support; inter-rater reliability is low for many disorders; several sections contain poorly written, confusing, or contradictory information; and the psychiatric drug industry unduly influenced the manual's content.  Many of the members of work groups for the DSM-5 had conflicting interests, including ties to pharmaceutical companies.  Various scientists have argued that the DSM-5 forces clinicians to make distinctions that are not supported by solid evidence, distinctions that have major treatment implications, including drug prescriptions and the availability of health insurance coverage.  General criticism of the DSM-5 ultimately resulted in a petition, signed by many mental health organizations, which called for outside review of DSM-5.”

There’s only so much accomplished APA members, like Dr. Paul R. McHugh, can do against a social justice steamroller.  The APA and their DSM have been fully compromised and is now subject to social engineering, undue influence, and new definitions that are not supported by the evidence. 

If you thought you had problems with men in your daughter’s locker room or men winning women’s track events, wait until the LGBTQ activists are able to remove their next offending personality disorder, pedophilia, from the DSM.  Without their parent’s knowing, transgenders and transvestites in drag are reading to children across the country, in schools and libraries.  In Nicole Russel’s article, Forget Mr. Rogers: Drag Queen Reading Hour coming to a library near you, “It’s one thing for drag queens or transsexuals to lobby for equality via marches and even legislation.  It’s quite another to show up at a taxpayer-funded facility and showcase a very abnormal lifestyle as healthy, common, and educational.”  Kids coming from these events suddenly tell their folks they identify as another sex.  Where do you think they get that from?

The Trump administration needs to take the APA to court and decertify the compromised DSM-5 as the universal authority for psychiatric diagnoses in the United States and reject the APA’s guidance and the DSM-5 as the source reference for mental illnesses.  Secretary of Health and Human services, Alex Azar, should suspend the DSM-5, institute an immediate return to the DSM-4 standard, and form a working group to determine the need for a system of cataloging and diagnosing mental disorders that are not subject to the whims of political activists.

The federal government federalized airport security when they learned it had been fully compromised by a hostile and aggressive force whose sole goal was to destroy American culture.  The APA has been fully compromised by a rabid group of sexual activists and the DSM needs to be federalized and managed as a “national standard.”  A national diagnostic and statistical manual should not be subject to social justice and party politics influence.

Friday, October 12, 2018

Mark won the 2018 PenCraft Award 1st Place Winner for Children for his book AIRSHOW! and the 1st Place Winner for Fiction - Thriller - General  for his novel Blown Cover
2018 PenCraft Award Ceremony for Literary Excellence

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Is Barack Obama the Titular Leader of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Senator Ted Cruz is the latest political figure to call on the State Department to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.  Cruz introduced Senate bill S. 68 and said, “It’s time to call the enemy by its name.”  Earlier this year, the Trump Administration designated some affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations:
@StateDept has designated Ismail Haniyeh, Harakat al-Sabireen, Liwa al Thawra, and Harakat Sawa’d Misr (HASM) as Specially Designated Global Terrorists under Section 1(b) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13224.

17 years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, most Americans are aware of the most notorious and violent of the Islamist groups, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.  However, outside counterterrorism circles and the Washington Beltway, it is unlikely if Americans are aware of the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood movement.  And they are less likely to know how their former President advanced the Muslim Brotherhood movement and its supremacist agenda, here and abroad.
A specific document submitted into evidence during America's largest terrorist prosecution in U.S. federal court, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, et al, had a remarkable history.  When it was translated and published, the Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Plan in America was entitled: An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.  

That story began when the FBI’s Washington Field Office executed a search warrant of a home in Annandale, Virginia.  Within a hidden sub-basement were the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.  “Among the 80 banker-boxes worth of documents discovered there were papers that confirmed what investigators and counterterrorism experts had long suspected and contended about the myriad Muslim-American groups in the United States: nearly all of them are controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.”  
The innocuous-sounding Explanatory Memorandum explained how the Muslim Brotherhood sought to extend sharia into the United States and Canada.  The document outlined “the mission of the Muslim Brother in North America” through an undated paper entitled “Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan.”  
Phase One: Phase of discreet and secret establishment of leadership.

The Congressional Black Caucus buried 2005 Obama-Farrakhan photo.  In 2018, photojournalist Askia Muhammad released a photo showing former President Barack Obama and the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan from Obama’s years as a state senator.  Referring to the possibility at the time that the young senator was being considered for a presidential run, Muhammad noted, “The Minister Farrakhan and his reputation would hurt someone trying to win acceptance in the broad cross-section.”  Noteworthy, Muhammad also said that “Obama had people from the Nation of Islam working on his staff and in his office in the Chicago, his Senate staff.  The members of the Nation of Islam helped him in his Senate campaign and on the South Side of Chicago.”  Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said that he would not have campaigned for the former Senator if he had known about the picture of Obama and Farrakhan.  One of the greatest powers the media have is their power to ignore.  Media suppression works.
A WikiLeaks-released email from John Podesta (a member of the Obama campaign’s transition team), was a bombshell.  Advisers to Obama’s presidential campaign were directed to choose Arab Muslims over Arab Christians for the top jobs. (Emphasis mine.)  This just doesn’t sound like the work of a Christian.  
Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities.  Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.

When President Bush was in the White House, he created the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.  The democrats and media lambasted the project and ridiculed him unmercifully.  When President Obama came into office, he quietly directed his cabinet to implement Muslim initiatives and outreach programs.  Congress became aware of the strategic plan when President Obama directed NASA administrator Charles Bolden that his highest priority should be “to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science...and math and engineering.”  NASA went on a Muslim hiring spree, as did other government agencies.  Government contracting offices insisted on companies to institute diversity hiring programs if the company wished to do business with the government. 
Sensitive and top-level government positions were filled by Muslims with questionable loyalties to the United States.  One of the FBI's former top experts on Islam announced that President Obama's pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago.  Hillary Clinton's top campaign aide, Huma Abedin, edited a radical Muslim publication that blamed the U.S. for 9/11.  Syed Abedin, the father of Huma, outlined his M.B. view of sharia law and how the Western world has turned Muslims “hostile.”
Phase Three: Escalation phase, prior to conflict and confrontation with the rulers, through utilizing mass media.

With the election of President Obama in November 2008 and his Muslim Outreach initiatives, exemplified by his Cairo “A New Beginnings” speech at Al Azhar University, the Obama administration extended a formal welcome to the Muslim Brotherhood.  Investor's Business Daily noted a lengthy chronology of events in support of the Muslim Brotherhood, punctuated by the overthrow of the Mubarak regime in Egypt during the Arab Spring of 2011 that swept the Muslim Brotherhood into power.  Obama delivered his Cairo speech, infuriating Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak by inviting Muslim Brotherhood leaders to attend. 
In 2009, the White House invited the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) president to President Obama's inauguration ceremonies, even though the Justice Department just two years earlier had blacklisted the Brotherhood affiliate as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land trial.  There were hundreds of similar events and the leaders of the FBI and the intelligence community were silent.  They had been dispatched to execute Muslim outreach programs and they did.
Phase Four: Open public confrontation with government through exercising the political pressure approach.

President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton facilitated the overthrow of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.  They encouraged him to resign allowing the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood to fill the power vacuum.  The 2012 presidential election saw the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi, become Egypt’s first president to gain power through an election.  Just as he was supporting US counterterrorism efforts, Muamar Gaddafi was next to lose his position to a reinvigorated Muslim Brotherhood and he lost his life.
Phase Five: Seizing power to establish their Islamic Nation.

The enemy camp is the United States of America, and we are the targets of a stealthy jihad.  The Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Plan is being implemented.  Barack Obama has planted the seeds of sharia wherever he goes.  Within eight years he enabled the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate the highest levels of the U.S. government by the thousands.  Infiltration would have been total with the election of Hillary Clinton and her Muslim Brotherhood proxy, Huma Abedin.
How did we get a Muslim in the White House?  Thank the media and their complete lack of researching and reporting on Barack Obama.  Who but a Muslim would ensure his congressional offices were staffed by Nation of Islam members?  Like the photo of Obama and Farrakhan that is something the media knew all too well but kept it under their kufi.
His favorite sound was the Call to Prayer.  No one ever questioned his Muslim faith.  There is no Christian on the planet who would ever make the “honest mistake” of saying “…so and so has never questioned my Zoroastrian faith.”  In the context of the Explanatory Memorandum, to the men and women of the Muslim Brotherhood he was “The One they have been waiting for.”  
And it all came to a stop with the election of President Donald J. Trump.
Is the former President the titular head of the Muslim Brotherhood?  How remarkable is it when you take the strategic plan of the MB and like a puzzle piece, look all over the planet for the right one that fits and it is right there in front of you.  Slightly covered up by other distracting pieces.  But it is there.  If not him then who?

Sunday, August 26, 2018

How Fake News made a President, how they are trying to unmake President Trump

President Donald Trump continues to be hammered over his statement that the “fake news” is the “enemy of America.” 

Every time the President delivers his comments at a Trump Rally and pokes at the media as “the fake news,” the media become incensed and counterattacks, usually by rolling out their favorite go-to media whores, Senator Schumer or Rep Pelosi, for a sanctimonious rebuttal: “…suppression of a free press is how ‘dictators get started.’  We need a free press.”

More recently, the President’s “fake news” comments are considered by the media, collectively, as “dangerous,” as if SEAL Team snipers have been ordered to the rooftops of skyscrapers to pop those network stars who dared to criticize the President.

While the media has been generating and feeding Americans “fake news” for decades, they truly turned “fake news” into an art form with the 2007 elections.  Specifically, the media distorted and lied about the presidential candidates’ eligibility for President, under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.  Both Republican and Democrat candidates, Senators McCain and Obama.  Americans may be shocked to know that both candidates had “issues” with their eligibility but these issues were never fully explored or investigated, or accurately reported. 

Instead of researching and reporting the facts and circumstances regarding each candidate’s eligibility under Article II, any discussion devolved into deflections.  Newsrooms coordinated their efforts and avoided the facts.  The media created their own set of rules and definitions.  These fake news discussions were played out on network television, by vociferous partisan panel members.  Never was an immigration attorney consulted, never was a constitutional scholar consulted. 

The media had the same access to information as the general public.  Any competent and inquisitive journalist desiring to become a little smarter on the arcane and Article II topic of “natural born citizen” should have found a remarkable document, thanks to Al Gore’s amazing internet.

In her 1988 article, in the Yale Law Journal, The Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility: An Approach for Resolving Two Hundred Years of Uncertainty, law student Jill Pryor wrote, “It is well settled that ‘native-born’ citizens, those born in the United States, qualify as natural born.  It is also clear that persons born abroad of alien parents, who later become citizens by naturalization, do not.  But whether a person born abroad of American parents, or of one American and one alien parent, qualifies as natural born has never been resolved.”

In other words, for the 2007 election, Ms. Pryor’s article would suggest that the U.S. Constitution was sufficiently vague in two disparate areas: whether either John McCain, a person born abroad of American parents, or Barack Obama, a person born of one American and one alien parent, actually qualified as a “natural born citizen.” 

The media—and the DNC—understood the implications of Ms. Pryor’s article.  If or when tested by a federal court, there would likely be only one favorable outcome.  As plaintiff, John McCain, would most likely succeed in his lawsuit.  He should be considered “a natural born citizen,” as his parents would have likely given birth to John in America “but for” his parents’ assignment to Panama precluded him from being born in the United States.  Candidate John McCain was a “natural born citizen” although he was born in a foreign land.

On the other hand, Ms Pryor’s article suggests that if or when tested by a federal court, that a candidate like Barack Obama, a person born of one American and one alien parent, would not qualify as a natural born citizen.  The Supreme Court, in its due diligence, would research and acknowledge that the Founding Fathers created this “national rule” to prevent anyone from interpreting “natural born citizen” under common laws rules because it eliminated the possibility of a child being born with more than one claim of allegiance.  Simply, Barack Obama, with a Kenyan father and an American mother, was born to a parent who owed his allegiance to a foreign sovereignty, that the child was born under two constitutions of two nations, a “dual national,” and consequently subject to split allegiance.  The court would not rule in Mr. Obama’s favor.

Senator Barack Obama’s “untested” probable ineligibility to be President was a major problem for the Democrats and the media.  If he was to continue running for President, the only way to help Senator Obama cross the finish line was to ensure Senator McCain, the only person who had “standing” to bring a lawsuit, never filed a lawsuit challenging his opponent’s eligibility.  Congress proclaimed John McCain as a “natural born citizen” under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.  Congress was silent on Barack Obama’s eligibility other than to say the U.S. Constitution is vague.

The “fake news” marshalled their forces and asserted on television and in the print media a simple narrative, that Senator Obama was eligible to run for President, that he was “a natural born citizen” under Article II by virtue of being “naturally born in Hawaii.”  Whoopi Goldberg on The View said so, as did numerous others, thus it must have been true. 

It wasn’t until after the election that private citizen, Donald Trump, did what many skeptical Americans did at the time, he listened to the media that he was a part of and took the “fake news’” birth certificate “birther” bait. 

At some time during the Obama Administration, Donald Trump learned that the election of Barack Obama occurred because the Republicans and the Republican candidate had been either poorly informed or too cowardly to take Senator Obama to court.  During the presidential primaries, Candidate Trump threatened to sue Republican candidates, Senators Rubio and Cruz, over their questionable Article II eligibility. 

This unincorporated media amalgam we ascribe as “fake news” believes they made the election of Barack Obama possible.  By keeping him out of the judicial system and exposing his untested credentials, the “fake news” was able to carry and maintain an offsetting message, that questioning the eligibility of Barack Obama made one a vile racist.  This tactic worked well.

Now they believe they can unmake the election of President Trump.  The strategies the “fake news” perfected during the Obama campaign are being used by the media and the FBI to disqualify and remove President Trump by impeachment.  The bogus FBI-generated dossier is more “fake news.”

I am reminded of the oath I took as an officer in the Marine Corps.  The important part: I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. 

Who defines, “…enemies, foreign and domestic?”  “Fake news” redefined the term “natural born citizen” to suit their means and political goals.  It wasn’t the U.S. Supreme Court that debated and defined the constitutional term. 

It seems to me that when the free press “takes sides” and operates out of their charter as “the free press” and becomes “the fake news” by manufacturing lies and bogus documents, and actively conspiring with an opposition party to facilitate the overthrow of a duly elected President, the totality of their actions should to be reconsidered.  The Fourth Estate is not only engaged in partisan Fifth Column activities as an extension of the deep state’s intelligence community.  But the media has sent their version of SEAL Team Six into battle, to work clandestinely to politically assassinate their enemies.  Death by a thousand cuts.  The “fake news” is the Sixth Column—what we are witnessing is they are the resistance.  They function as the French Resistance functioned, cells were small groups of men and women who, in addition to their guerrilla warfare activities, were also publishers of underground newspapers.

The “fake news” views their work as fighting their enemy.  The media declared war on President Trump.  The “fake news” is the enemy of America.

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

I checked the Drudgereport and what do I see as one of their top stories:  Special Access....  No, not my book--not my blog.  The article: Facebook granted devices from Huawei, a Chinese telecom firm, Special Access to social data.  
This is exactly why I dumped facebook.

Monday, June 4, 2018

I've shut down my facebook page.  For those of you who received the notification, "Welcome to Special Access."  Here you can find information on my novels, children's books, and articles from American Thinker as well as other things that readers with Special Access can find (maybe) nowhere else.  Such as:

My fifth novel, "Wet Works," the manuscript has been sent to the Publication Review Board.  Hopefully it will be returned within a month or two without redactions.

Wet Work is a euphemism for murder or assassination, alluding to the "spilling of blood."  These government operations are reputed to have been handled at the KGB by Spetsbureau 13, colorfully known as the "Department of Wet Affairs" or simply the "13th Directorate."

The Russian expression "wet job"can be traced to at least the 19th century from Russian criminal slang and originally meant robbery that involved murder, i.e., spilling blood.

More to follow!

Friday, December 22, 2017

Mark's new article:  Stopping the Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Plan to Infiltrate America

Few Americans are aware of America’s largest terrorist prosecution in U.S. federal court, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, et al.  During the trial, in November of 2008, the government presented evidence that the Holy Land Foundation and five defendants provided approximately $12.4 million in support to Hamas and its goal of creating an Islamic Palestinian state by eliminating the State of Israel through violent jihad. 

(From The Center for Security Policy)  In August of 2004, an alert Maryland Transportation Authority Police officer observed a woman wearing traditional Islamic garb videotaping the support structures of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, and conducted a traffic stop.  The driver was Ismail Elbarasse and detained on an outstanding material witness warrant issued in Chicago in connection with fundraising for Hamas.  The FBI’s Washington Field Office subsequently executed a search warrant on Elbarasse’s residence in Annandale, Virginia.  In the basement of his home, a hidden sub-basement was found; it revealed over 80 banker boxes of the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.”  One of the most important of these documents made public to date was entered into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation trial.  It amounted to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan in America and was entitled, “An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.
From the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in America, the innocuous-sounding Explanatory Memorandum explained how the Muslim Brotherhood sought to extend sharia into the United States and Canada.  Another document referenced from the U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation trial was an undated paper entitled “Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan.”  It specified the five phases of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement in North America.  
Phase One: Phase of discreet and secret establishment of leadership.
Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities.  Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.
On October 30, 2008, candidate Barack Obama famously exclaimed, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”  Candidate Obama gave specific guidance for staffing his Administration, captured in an email from September 2008, advisers would choose Arab Muslims over Arab Christians for the top jobs. 

While the Obama transition team aimed to hire Muslims “for the top jobs,” President Obama directed his cabinet and political appointees to develop and implement “Muslim Outreach” programs.  He told NASA administrator Charles Bolden that his highest priority should be “to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering.”  President Obama announced plans for the first ever federally funded Muslim outreach program.  The program would be available nationwide for all elementary school students grade K-12.  The program was designed to educate children about the fundamentals of the Muslim religion and Islamic belief.  When CIA Director John Panetta visited Dearborn, Michigan he too was complying with the directives of President Obama.  Panetta articulated he wanted to boost CIA recruitment efforts in Arab and Muslim communities.

With the election of President Obama in November 2008 and his Muslim Outreach initiative, exemplified by his Cairo A New Beginnings Speech” at al Azhar University, the Obama administration officially extended a welcome to the Muslim Brotherhood.  
Investor’s Business Daily provided a chronology of events, How the CIA Helped the Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrate the West.  The Muslim Brotherhood’s star was rising and became a partner in the Obama White House.  The crown jewel of Muslim Brotherhood influence was the fall of the Mubarak regime in Egypt during the Arab Spring of 2011.  The White House fully supported the Muslim Brotherhood candidate, Mohamad Morsi, for president.  
Another cabinet member, Secretary Hillary Clinton, stressed her belief that “we must increase outreach not simply to American Muslims, but to Muslims around the world.”  Secretary Clinton’s right hand aide, Huma Abedin, may have been the go-to person for the State Department’s “Muslim outreach” programs.  It is noteworthy that Huma Abedin and her family have strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and promoted a hardline Islamic ideology.  For 12 years, Huma Abedin, edited a radical Muslim publication that blamed the U.S. for September 11, 2001.  Syed Abedin, Huma’s father, outlined his Muslim Brotherhood view of sharia law and how the Western world has turned Muslims “hostile.”  
During her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and her minions found ways to remove sensitive and highly classified information from State Department offices.  The public became aware that Secretary Clinton eschewed the State Department’s classified and unclassified email systems for a private “homebrew” and off-site email server.  When Mrs. Clinton stepped down from her post, she was likely under investigation by the FBI for her role in the Clinton Foundation, she was likely under investigation by the FBI for espionage, and she was likely under investigation for the destruction of her official records and emails.  
FBI Director Comey held a press conference on July 5, 2016.  “We did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” 

There were a substantial number of members of Congress and the intelligence community that Hillary Clinton should have been charged for violating the Espionage Act of 1917.  During the third Presidential debate Nominee Trump announced the Clinton Foundation was “a criminal enterprise” and “She shouldn't be allowed to run.  It’s—She's guilty of a very, very serious crime.” 
Whether there is intent to harm the United States or not, the essence of espionage is to remove classified documents out of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF, and put them into the hands of “someone not authorized to receive them.”  While there were over a thousand secret or higher classified documents on her private server, Mrs. Clinton disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 33,000 emails that she deemed “personal.”  When Mrs. Clinton stepped down from her position, Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Documents.”
The history of the Obama administration is one rife with connections to or with the Muslim Brotherhood and the preferential hiring of Muslims “for the top job.”  Some WikiLeaks emails describe that sensitive and top-level government positions were to be filled by Muslims.  Would they have questionable loyalties to the United States?  After the disgraced David Petraeus was removed from his position as CIA Director, one of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam announced that President Obama’s pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, had converted to Islam years ago.  Apparently everyone in Washington knew it but it was never reported.  John Brennan was full of surprises after becoming CIA Director.  During an interview, John Brennan clearly stated that he voted for the Communist Party candidate, Gus Hall, for President of the United States.  
What was in Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 emails?  Correspondence with Barack Obama under an alias?  Correspondence with Clinton Foundation members and donors?  Correspondence with Vladimir Putin or other Russian politicians?  My money is on correspondence with the Muslim Brotherhood.  The assured election of Hillary Clinton was to be the third term of Barack Obama, as Barack Obama and his minions worked tirelessly to fulfill the dictates of the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan to infiltrate the American government.  What is more “fundamentally transforming” for the United States than an open door policy for the immigration of Muslims, or the infiltration of Muslims in the government?  Also remember, Barack Obama reversed President Bush’ policy and removed the FBI from conducting surveillance on mosques.  
If Donald Trump were to be elected, is it reasonable to expect that all of Obama’s strategic work to “transform the United States of America” through “Muslim outreach” or “Muslim engagement” programs as well as to facilitate the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy of phased infiltration of Muslims into government would be systematically undone through a complete rejection and reversal of President Obama’s policies?  
Isn’t that what we are seeing today? 
Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook